RESEARCH ARTICLE
Differential Poly(I:C) Responses of Human Vγ9Vδ2 T Cells Stimulated with Pyrophosphates Versus Aminobisphosphonates
Stefanie Ohnesorge§, †, Hans-Heinrich Oberg, Christian Peters§, Ottmar Janssen, Dieter Kabelitz‡, Daniela Wesch*, ‡
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2009Volume: 2
First Page: 135
Last Page: 142
Publisher Id: TOIJ-2-135
DOI: 10.2174/1874226200902010135
Article History:
Received Date: 20/5/2009Revision Received Date: 29/5/2009
Acceptance Date: 24/7/2009
Electronic publication date: 23/10/2009
Collection year: 2009
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Bacterial pyrophosphates or aminobisphosphonates induce cytokine secretion and expansion of freshly isolated (resting) human Vγ9Vδ2 γδ T cells. The initial expansion of γδ T cells strictly depends on co-stimulatory signals of accessory cells and IL-2. However, resting γδ T cells produce cytokines after stimulation with pyrophosphates combined with TLR3 ligand poly(I:C) in the absence of accessory cells. We observed that aminobisphosphonate together with poly(I:C) stimulation did not induce cytokine secretion in resting γδ T cells. Moreover, proliferation of γδ T cells within PBMC was enhanced after stimulation with pyrophosphates and poly(I:C), but not after stimulation with aminobisphosphonates plus poly(I:C), even though accessory cells were present. Aminobisphosphonate together with poly(I:C) induced a delayed up-regulation of co-stimulatory molecules and cell survival of monocytes within PBMC. In contrast to resting γδ T cells, activated Vγ9Vδ2 T cells produced IFN-γ after stimulation with pyrophosphate antigens as well as with aminobisphosphonate in the absence of accessory cells and poly(I:C). However, aminobisphosphonate stimulation resulted in much lower IFN-γ production than pyrophosphate stimulation, which fits well with the weaker aminobisphosphonate induced activation of extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) involved in IFN-γ secretion. Poly(I:C) failed to enhance cytokine production and proliferation of activated γδ T cell lines after aminobisphosphonate stimulation unless accessory cells were added. Taken together, the results suggest a differential regulation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation by pyrophosphates and aminobisphosphonates, especially after co-stimulation with poly(I:C). This might be relevant when using such pyrophosphates or aminobisphosphonates together with TLR3 agonists as adjuvants in γδ T cell-based immunotherapy.