RESEARCH ARTICLE


Differential Poly(I:C) Responses of Human Vγ9Vδ2 T Cells Stimulated with Pyrophosphates Versus Aminobisphosphonates



Stefanie Ohnesorge§, , Hans-Heinrich Oberg, Christian Peters§, Ottmar Janssen, Dieter Kabelitz, Daniela Wesch*,
Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany


© 2009 Ohnesorgeet al;

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Institute of Immunology, UKS-H, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3, Haus 17, D-24105 Kiel, Germany; Tel: +49-431-5973379; Fax: +49 -431-5973335; E-mail: wesch@immunologie.uni-kiel.de
§ This work forms part of the diploma thesis of SO and the Ph.D. thesis of CP.
Equally contributing senior authors.
Present Address: Research Group Immunology & Proteomics, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68163 Mannheim, Germany


Abstract

Bacterial pyrophosphates or aminobisphosphonates induce cytokine secretion and expansion of freshly isolated (resting) human Vγ9Vδ2 γδ T cells. The initial expansion of γδ T cells strictly depends on co-stimulatory signals of accessory cells and IL-2. However, resting γδ T cells produce cytokines after stimulation with pyrophosphates combined with TLR3 ligand poly(I:C) in the absence of accessory cells. We observed that aminobisphosphonate together with poly(I:C) stimulation did not induce cytokine secretion in resting γδ T cells. Moreover, proliferation of γδ T cells within PBMC was enhanced after stimulation with pyrophosphates and poly(I:C), but not after stimulation with aminobisphosphonates plus poly(I:C), even though accessory cells were present. Aminobisphosphonate together with poly(I:C) induced a delayed up-regulation of co-stimulatory molecules and cell survival of monocytes within PBMC. In contrast to resting γδ T cells, activated Vγ9Vδ2 T cells produced IFN-γ after stimulation with pyrophosphate antigens as well as with aminobisphosphonate in the absence of accessory cells and poly(I:C). However, aminobisphosphonate stimulation resulted in much lower IFN-γ production than pyrophosphate stimulation, which fits well with the weaker aminobisphosphonate induced activation of extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) involved in IFN-γ secretion. Poly(I:C) failed to enhance cytokine production and proliferation of activated γδ T cell lines after aminobisphosphonate stimulation unless accessory cells were added. Taken together, the results suggest a differential regulation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation by pyrophosphates and aminobisphosphonates, especially after co-stimulation with poly(I:C). This might be relevant when using such pyrophosphates or aminobisphosphonates together with TLR3 agonists as adjuvants in γδ T cell-based immunotherapy.